Transcend Dualism

Your awesome Tagline

Posts tagged feminist

4 notes

I am so tired…

bunnyscotcooper:

…of the bullshit. I have been even more enlightened than I have been before. The intersectionality that see affecting the lives of many oppressed people today has become a working system that is unbelievably working automatically these days. I can’t even begin to explain the frustration I feel today after reading a book called Black Feminist Thought. Am I going protesting in the streets? I want to. But am I going to let the knowledge I just gained go to waste? Feminism isn’t anti-family, and it isn’t anti-man just because it is pro-woman. And Feminism isn’t for the middle-class white American woman like Betty Friedan or Gloria Steinem have seemed to perpetuate. Its for the Black woman, Latina woman, White woman, Asian woman, of all class levels and of all sexualities.

Filed under black feminist thought feminist oppression anti-oppression anti-family anti-man betty friedan gloria steinem

Notes

stfuconservatives:

accordingtosami:

Answering Sami: On: Re: Am I culpable in my contraceptive marriage?

trustinjesus:

The Church herself has never oppressed women. This is a fallacy. In fact, the most important and perfect creature (Jesus is God, begotten not made, mind you) is Mary, Jesus’ mother. She is the Ark of the new covenant, the First Christian and everything that we should all aspire to be as a creature. Women play a vital role in the Church and in our lives in general. Women and men are equal but our natures are different - our roles are different. Failure to recognize this is failing to recognize who you or I are.

This is so wrong it’s laughable. That’s like the KKK saying it’s never promoted racism. Are you actually telling me the church believes that men and women are equals? C’mon. In the OT, if a man accuses his wife of not being a virgin, and her father can’t prove she was, she gets put to death. If it’s ruled that she was falsely accused, does he get put to death? Nope. If a man RAPES a woman, she should marry him so she’s not, what, a slut? Because it was her fault, so now she has to be married to her rapist. And I don’t want to hear about “oh Jesus came and voided those laws and everything is happy times now!” because I went to mass for 12 years, there was a reading out of the old testament every day. Obviously the book is still relevant. 

I edited this down to the most important point: this person believes the church has never oppressed women. All the gods are male, and women can’t be ordained in a Catholic church, and woman is responsible for original sin, and every religion in the history of ever has treated women as inferior in some way, but whoa, Jesus had a mom! It’s all good!

 *Looks the the left “Oh look, ‘When Women Were Priests: Women’s Leadership in the Early Church & the Scandal of their Subordination in the Rise of Christianity’ the same book I was planning on quoting about today.”

“The Vatican’s 1976 Declaration on the Question of Admitting Women to the Priesthood justifies its exclusion of women from the priesthood on the grounds that the female body does not resemble the male body of Christ.  It is therefore impossible for a woman to perform the sacramental functions of a priest.  Here again, sexuality enters the picture. A woman, unlike a man, is perceived to be inseparable from her sexual nature, and as a priest she would bring sexuality into the realm of the sacred. … If God is thought of as male, people tend to equate power with maleness.  Thus, if females were to represent God, then femaleness would be equated with power. … Thus the issue of women’s religious leadership is embedded in a larger context - that of cultural beliefs about gender, those of contemporary American society and those of ancient Greco-Roman cultures. … The public-versus-private convention was in turn supported by a system of cultural values that associated men with honor and women with shame.  The quest for honor and precedence associated with public office was viewed as an exclusively masculine enterprise.  In contrast, a woman’s honor was her shame, that is, her reputation for chastity.  A woman exercising public authority could be accused of projecting a masculine personality; but, even worse, she could be called unchaste.” —-Karen Jo Torjesen

Filed under God christianity christian history christian history women women's rights women's history feminism feminist jesus patrairchal patrairchy culture cultural beliefs religion religious religious leadership leadership shame masculinity femininity

4 notes

I don’t know if anybody decided to make a fuck you peta blog or not, and since I don’t want to commit to looking for peta shit every single time I’m on the computer, I’m just going to post what I find once in awhile.  *As a disclaimer, I’m in no way going to complain about them trying to end animal cruelty… just the way they choose to do it, by confronting their rampant sexist exploitation.*

Filed under peta P.E.T.A. sexism sexist exploitation feminist anti feminist oppression sexualization media exploitation medai ads fuck you food

23 notes

sex-torture as comedy

“This year’s Hot Tub Time Machine features a scene where a group of strangers circle two grown men in a bathroom and force one man to give the other a blowjob, while they both sob. Also from this year: in Get Him to the Greek the main character is forced by his friends to go off with a woman who tries to (or maybe does? the camera cuts away) put a dildo up his bum while he cries and begs her not to. And in the mother of all bromances, The 40 Year Old Virgin, a group of friends put a porn movie on surround sound and then lock their sexually shy friend in the room alone and refuse to let him out. Note: all of these scenes are supposed to be funny. Not funny with a bitter edge, just straight up, laugh out loud funny. In other words, the target audiences of these films are asked to identify with a group of characters on a quest, and then guffaw when said characters are sexually humiliated. That’s some deep shit. ”

“When I started out thinking about the recurring scenes of sex-torture in recent bromances, I figured that—apart from being reinforcements of homophobic culture on overdrive—they must have some kind of cathartic function for audiences. The entire bromance genre is based on heteronormative adult men’s inability to express love and affection for each other. Consciously, writers write sex-torture as comedy because they think sexual violation is funny. Unconsciously, I think we can argue that these scenes exist because our culture of masculinity uses the threat of non-consensual sex to punish men for natural feelings of affection and admiration for their friends. “

Filed under sex torture sexual assault sexual violence violence rape assault comedy dark humor humor dark comedy feminism feminist heteronormative homophobia masculinity bromance culture society media movies deep shit non-consensual sex

8 notes

excuse me sir your misogyny is showing

 Saturday, June 19, 2010

Don’t call me bitch.

Oh, I can call myself a free bitch, baby, or Bitch Queen of the Universe, or a babe in total control of herself, but these are different than 99.9% of conversational use — they evoke power, turning the classical definition of ‘bitch’ on its head.  Reclaiming the word, turning it into a compliment rather than a tool used to remind women of their ‘place.’

So what is a bitch?

Let’s check out the top definitions at Urban Dictionary, font of all things worth knowing.

(1) Word used to describe the act of whining excessively. (2) Person who rides specifically in the middle of a front-seatting only car meant for 2 passengers or less. (3) Modern-day servant; A person who performs tasks for another, usually degrading in status. (4) Term used to exclaim hardship.

A bitch is someone who whines irritatingly, someone who takes the worst seat in the vehicle, a servant who performs degrading tasks, or something awful that happens to someone (‘Wow, that’s a bitch.’)  Catching the theme, here?  You don’t want to be a bitch.  A bitch is annoying, cowed, humiliated by others, hardly human, more of a thing.

“Don’t take things so personally.  Just because I say something is a bitch totally doesn’t mean I’m calling you a bitch.  Chill out.”  Nope.  ‘Bitch’ is misogynistic language.  Look around — who’s female around here?  Me.  Just me.  Scuse me while I stand the hell up for myself.  Examine: who ‘rides bitch’ in any sort of vehicle?  The woman.  When someone is another’s ‘bitch,’ they are subservient.  This phrase is almost uniquely used to describe men put in emasculating situations, because guess who’s the bitch all the rest of the time?  Women.  You quote Pulp Fiction with your buddies:

(paraphrased):
“Does he look like a bitch?”
“No.”
“Then why’d you try to fuck him like a bitch?”
I think this describes the bit where Marsellus Wallace is raped.  Note: ‘to fuck him like a bitch’ = rape.  Bitches are raped.  Other people do what they like, sexually, with bitches, regardless of the fact that the bitch is actually a person.  I feel threatened that you guys quote this, giggling: bitches get fucked.  Fucking is something that males do to others rather than a fifty-fifty between two consenting individuals.  Bitches get raped.

You following?  The word bitch pertains to women.  Look around.  I am the only woman here.  And if I weren’t, you can bet your booties I’d still be hollering about it, because you’d still be talking about me, you’d just also be victimizing several other ladies, too.  And even if you’re definitely not talking about me, I’ll still be talking about it, because calling a woman a bitch because she’s strong and opinionated is not okay — it’s a way to silence her.

*I spent the weekend in rather loathsome company and BOY DO I HAVE THINGS TO SAY.
**Calling a male a bitch is a whole ‘nother post, reflecting classic heterosexual insecurity with anything that stretches the boundaries of masculinity.  

Filed under bitch rape misogyny violence masculinity sexual violence feminism feminist

0 notes

This is what Victoria Secret sent to us in the mail just the other day.  For one thing, they somehow illegally got our address when mom used her debit card.  There is no way in hell she would ever give them our information, for this exact reason.  We don’t want crap in our mail box.  So they’ve been sending us stuff… But this is over the top.  Soft porn at it’s best.  I’m sure they have worse, and this is probably normal for them… Never before have I been so keenly reminded of what I am, and how society views my sex. 

This is what Victoria Secret sent to us in the mail just the other day.  For one thing, they somehow illegally got our address when mom used her debit card.  There is no way in hell she would ever give them our information, for this exact reason.  We don’t want crap in our mail box.  So they’ve been sending us stuff… But this is over the top.  Soft porn at it’s best.  I’m sure they have worse, and this is probably normal for them… Never before have I been so keenly reminded of what I am, and how society views my sex. 

Filed under sexist exploitation exploitation feminism feminist body image sexualization media exploitation media. ads soft porn victoria secret social standards

80 notes

On Second Wave and Liberal Feminists…

shakepaper:

Though I appreciate the things that the second wave of feminism did, it should be noted that the second wave of feminism was very essentialist and did not take the intersections of oppression into account. So, if your definition of feminism only extends to women going into the workforce, and having equal representation in patriarchal institutions, then I do not consider you an ally because your narrow notions of feminism continue to oppress me and other folks who are queer, transgendered, poc, poor, disabled etc… Furthermore, let it be known that I find reformism boring, ineffective and complicit in the oppression of our sisters and comrades. We do not have to comply to with the white supremacist capitalist patriarchy so that we too could be included in these systems of domination. If we want to make change, then we have to tear it down. Because, within these systems, though some “women” may be given privileges that were once accorded only to men, other women will continue to be oppressed. For example, if a woman becomes a CEO in the Western world, there will most likely be women who are being exploited in their factories. If women are now “valued” because they can go out into the workplace, then it still perpetuates a devaluation of women who cannot work. If women are free because they can vote, then it legitimizes a system in which divisions between “citizens” and “non-citizens” are made, and people without status continue to have no rights. So, until you realize that the nature of this idealized form of liberation is very western and essentialist (and most importantly, very privileged), then I consider you dangerous and a threat to the struggle. Equality for “women” to you, really means, equality for some women.

Liberation should occur in all its forms and for all peoples.

* It should also be noted that the term “woman” itself needs to be interrogated and taken not as an identity that is biologically determined, but as an identity that is socially constructed and strategically used to enforce normative gendered behaviours and desires. 

 Fuck Yes

Filed under sexism power patriarchy equality women women's rights socially constructed normative gendered behaviours oppression feminism feminist racism classism patriarchal istitutions queer homophobia transgender disablism